If you've bought a derelict property since March 2016, you may be due a refund if you paid an SDLT surcharge on the purchase of that property ...
A derelict property is one that someone can't live in. Although services such as gas and water were connected, the interior piping had been removed, as had the floorboards. In addition, asbestos had been discovered, meaning no-one could legally live there, even if everything else was in working order.
The tribunal was asked to consider the question of if the property was suitable for use as a dwelling at the time of the purchase, and they concluded that no it was not. Although the judges did not provide examples of what would render a property habitable, it did consider HMRC's own literature in order to make its assessment.
So, therefore, as it wasn't possible for someone to live in the property at the time of the purchase, the building was classed as derelict, and consequently, no SDLT surcharge was due.
Of course, the facts will have to be examined on a case-by-case basis. Still, if you're in the process of purchasing a property that you consider to be uninhabitable, then you could apply to HMRC and present evidence regarding the condition of the property.
This evidence could include photographs, surveys, insurance reports and quotes for work to be done; maybe even eye-witness accounts to prove that the developer didn't do this themselves to get out of paying the SDLT surcharge.
Incentives are somewhat reversed now, and for that reason, combined with the potential loss of revenue, the Government may seek to close the loophole soon. If you're thinking of purchasing a derelict property, then now may be the optimum time to do it.
If you'd like to find out more about anything I've written here, do call me on 01908 774323 or leave a comment below and let's see how I can help you.